The courtroom mentioned the plaintiffs could not justify why they had been outside of possession from 1935 until the filing in the fit and did not supply the khata range or Khasra number of the property transferred in the Sale mutation. The petitioner argued that the Patwari, a revenue official, https://elliotzmaot.tinyblogging.com/what-does-mortgage-and-security-interests-advocate-in-karachi-near-me-mean-74984503